quote: Originally posted by TyGer STyLe
can someone explain to me the law of casualty?
basically it's what it sounds like. For every cause there is an effect, hence causality. This is a big argument in the free will debate, there's a philosopher named Spinoza who argues that everythign humans do is dictated through causes that are in our environment. We have no free will. Others will say either that we create the cause, we cause an effect even if its still an effectual action, or something else, you can imagine the arguments. Basically it's just saying that effects happen because of inherent causes, i.e. environment, other people, and etc.
And, relating to this thread, i'm basically saying that by predicting an effect is to eliminate the existence of the cause. This precognition becomes the ultimate cause and humans can't really create a cause, becuase then it wouldn't be a cause, it'd be an effect. And precognition can't predict a cause either, becuase then it'd be an effect instead, and therefore destroys causality...i guess...hehe, spinoza says we have no free will and therefore by accepting this idea that we can create causes...we have pretty much absolute free will in his eyes. It contradicts his writings, and furthermore this isn't an advocacy of spinoza so there's no need to quote this and respond as if did (hoho). In other words, what in nature caused us to have precognition? nothing, it's on another level...hmmm, i'll get back here later if you don't understand the implications. ahhh I need to go to sleep, night.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
Last edited by PsychoSnowman on 01-11-2003 at 04:56 AM
|