Jusunlee.com Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

Jusunlee.com Forums (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/index.php)
- Random Thoughts (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?forumid=2)
-- for newer members (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=4117)


Posted by tm11 on 08-14-2002 06:48 AM:

for newer members

quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy


you guys should tell me these things. :sad:



ok, since apparently it's our duty to tell members what threads we've already had, instead of letting them look for those threads themselves(which would just be atrocious), this thread will be dedicated to what threads we've already talked about. Just post the titles of a few, whatever you feel like.

__________________
word is bond


Posted by MiGhTy KiTTy on 08-14-2002 07:11 AM:

yes VERY good idea.


Posted by PsychoSnowman on 08-14-2002 11:56 PM:

i know it's not just me, but that post was meant to be sarcastic.

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell


Posted by MiGhTy KiTTy on 08-15-2002 05:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by PsychoSnowman
i know it's not just me, but that post was meant to be sarcastic.



NOT TRUE! if it is, then dont get mad at the pplz who accidentally post a thread that is similar to another one. SHEESH.


Posted by HHxEliTE on 08-15-2002 05:03 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by PsychoSnowman
i know it's not just me, but that post was meant to be sarcastic.


it was?? how confusing...

__________________
sHIET happens.. then u move ON


Posted by PsychoSnowman on 08-15-2002 05:35 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy



NOT TRUE! if it is, then dont get mad at the pplz who accidentally post a thread that is similar to another one. SHEESH.



SHEESH, you're the only one who ever gets mad at people for telling you it's all ready been posted before. Look at the posts, particularly when you isolated tea, he just said something like "uh, this was all ready a thread." And YOU blew up. It didn't sound like he was mad to me. but, YOU do. hahaha.

Calm down, it actually was meant to be sarcastic, i know TM11 in real life, and it was. It's not our responsibility to tell you nor is it that big of a deal to repeat threads. haha, i thought it was funny, i mean, a thread, with EVERY single topic we've ever discussed? It'd be over 3000 posts in this thread alone if we covered the threads that have occured to this present day, maybe more, and then it'd increase a whole lot in the future. hahaha, that is so ludicrous, why wouldn't it be sarcastic? (you don't need to answer that, it's a rhetoric)

If you want, play the victim. It was never a big deal in the first place. It's just that you did make quite a bit of repeat threads, and for the people who've been here...it'd only be natural to question why so many happened at the same time in such density. It's not unreasonable to ask you to look back at other threads (but it's really not that big of a deal, but it IS a deal if you get what i mean)...anyway look back at other threads if you want to reform, it's so ludicrous to blame us for not telling you about it, and even moreso to hold a thread about topics we've all ready done. No doubt it may fall into the zone of overencompasses Spam all ready hahah.

No offense in the post. Just trying to clear the situation up in one post.

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell


Posted by MiGhTy KiTTy on 08-15-2002 05:41 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by PsychoSnowman


SHEESH, you're the only one who ever gets mad at people for telling you it's all ready been posted before. Look at the posts, particularly when you isolated tea, he just said something like "uh, this was all ready a thread." And YOU blew up. It didn't sound like he was mad to me. but, YOU do. hahaha.



its not that im isolating him, he has been mean to me ever since i got here. is it my fault that i get mad at someone who is mean to me? i dont think so.


Posted by PsychoSnowman on 08-15-2002 06:53 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy

it's not that im isolating him, he has been mean to me ever since i got here.



ok, so you agree he and others weren't getting "mad" at you, it was you. It's not that your isolating him, it's that you try and come off as a, if you will, "victim" of everyone including tea who gets "mad" at you. But now i see you admit that he wasn't being "mad" only, "mean." I disagree about him being mean, but thats subjective so there's no point in arguing that. He said it so nicely in the thread about "whats your nationality?" and you just exploded. haha, you took it WAY to personally. Your fault, not his. Anyway, i'm glad you admitted that he wasn't getting mad at you. And thus, you created a scene by yourself? haha, man i don't know how to explain it...here it is bluntly:

Here's the deal, you screwed up (of which isn't that big of a deal), but you make it a some big thing...you play victim and try and avoid responsibility by pointing out fake misperceived emotions that were thrown at you. You don't have a justification. Get over it, fix it if you want, or don't let it bother you. You are the only one who has a problem. You could have just said "sorry" and it would have been over if you continued to not repeat your previous actions, but you didn't. You know, i'm not telling you anything new. Man, i'm sounding like Psytek.

quote:
is it my fault that i get mad at someone who is mean to me? i dont think so


yes.

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell


Posted by MiGhTy KiTTy on 08-15-2002 07:51 AM:

omfg snowman stfu. its not the nationality thread that he was mean to me about. damn why dont you just accept wat I THINK, you dont have to say anything about it. eesh. also i do admit is it my fault to repeat things but who actually looks for a topic that they wanan discuss? i think its insane to look up every topic you wanna start. so please dont tell me what i already know. ahh..watever..you win. okay? theres no point in arguing about this fucking topic. we have two different perspectives about this.


Posted by MC ChOpStiCkz on 08-15-2002 08:02 AM:

please please people can we juss drop it and get along??

there no point arguing about repeating othre post it sjuss dumb so lets hold hands and sing


Posted by Ladi Jay on 08-15-2002 08:18 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by PsychoSnowman

Psytek.



no David... DO NOT go there... puhaha


"can't we all just get along and hug?" -Joe

I've seen too many arguements between members over these passed few weeks... plz... :huh:


Posted by PsychoSnowman on 08-15-2002 07:52 PM:

yeah, hah, sorry! Yeah Julie, there have been a whole lot of arguments lately. Anyway, I won't go into psytek-esque routes further. All of a sudden, I guess i'm not "open-minded" enough haha (sarcasm). I don't accept what you think because i don't like being "responsible" for your mistake, not to mention that what you think is alwyas fluctuating, also because it's stupid. I was telling you what you wouldn't admit, not what you all ready knew (that statement contradicts every single one of your old posts) mightykitty, there's a difference. It's not that i'm not openminded enough, it's that you don't have a steady, good opinion...here's a brand new victim tactic you bring up, it's ludicrous again...thats the point of arguing; because we have two different opinions. And it doesn't matter if i didn't choose your ideal thread whre someone was being "mean" to you. The thread i chose shows what i described and how you behave irrationally rather quickly getting mad at everyone else who tells you politely theres all ready a thread like that. See? it didn't matter, even if it was effectual, the reactions are constant. Oh well, dropping it...moving on....hopefully even though i said some other things in this post. But....dropping it....as i stfu hahahaha

btw, such fowl language mightykitty. Could it be more anger that "we" have against you?

Actually, this was kind of a mean post, i apologize, there won't be anymore! Seriously. It's just that now i'm enthralled in this whole predicament, but was never really mad, as i'm being accused of.

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell


Posted by tm11 on 08-15-2002 08:48 PM:

First, to clarify, I am surprised someone thought I was being totally serious in my original post (I did kind of want to see how this would be played out, whether people would actually post titles of topics, or do otherwise. Either way I think somewhat of a service has been done to the forums. I might be wrong though). Anyways, I thought I was laying down the sarcasm pretty thickly... I suppose I could have been clearer.

quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
omfg snowman stfu.

I don't see why you need to resort to such ad homs because people disagree with you. If you want to be taken seriously don't be so immature. He's not even angry about this, why should you be?

quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
damn why dont you just accept wat I THINK, you dont have to say anything about it.

He shouldn't have to accept what you think, no one should have to. It's his right to say what's on his mind, just as everyone on this forum should speak their minds, In my opinion. In this instance, you happened to be very wrong. That's why he shouldn't just accept "wat you THINK." Anyways, he was being reasonable in his objections.

quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
theres no point in arguing about this fucking topic. we have two different perspectives about this.

Wow. You have quite a knack for pointing out the obvious. I am thoroughly surprised and amazed at this ability. If you both have differing opinions on something, that's no reason not to discuss your objections. No one has to "win" an argument here. I'm sure everyone here is aware of the differing opinions of the people participating in this thread, it's also obvious you weren't, until recently. That shouldn't stop a polite discussion from occuring, even if people are going to be brash. It doesn't seem to me that anyone here was arguing.

__________________
word is bond


Posted by PsychoSnowman on 08-15-2002 08:52 PM:

some topics that have been discussed:

-for newer members
-spiders
-what are you thinking about right now
-say something nice
-how long does it take for you to finish in the shower?

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell


Posted by MiGhTy KiTTy on 08-15-2002 09:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by tm11
He shouldn't have to accept what you think, no one should have to. It's his right to say what's on his mind, just as everyone on this forum should speak their minds, In my opinion. In this instance, you happened to be very wrong. That's why he shouldn't just accept "wat you THINK." Anyways, he was being reasonable in his objections.



okay, first off like you said he has a right to speak his mind so why couldnt i speak my mind? like you said even if i am wrong i have a right to speak my mind. so dont talk to me about speaking minds.

and another thing i dont care if i get angry about this. i have a right to be watever i want to be. and the reason why i got so mad at him is cuz he doesnt see my point and you dont either. but watever, like you said there is no winning right? so stop trying to keep this going.


Posted by tm11 on 08-15-2002 09:20 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy

and another thing i dont care if i get angry about this. i have a right to be watever i want to be. and the reason why i got so mad at him is cuz he doesnt see my point and you dont either. but watever, like you said there is no winning right? so stop trying to keep this going.



You're right, you are allowed to speak your mind, and I think you should. To point out, I never said you couldn't speak your mind anyways. Just be mindful of the other members in respect to reposting old threads, is the point i'm trying to make.
You also have a right to be mad, sure, but I think it's silly and immature of you for getting angry over this. I am not mad over this at all. I don't have to be mad about something to post about it.
By the way, I do see your point. However, I think your point is invalid, and insufficiently supported, that's why I can easily dismiss it.
By repyling, I'm not trying to "win", no matter what I will think you're wrong about this, but I do appreciate hearing your point of view, even if I disagree with it.
I don't see the point in cutting off discussion in this case though. People who are wrong tend to like to cut off discussion.

__________________
word is bond


Posted by PsychoSnowman on 08-15-2002 09:22 PM:

going against my own words and the chance of reiterating what has all ready been said...here i am replying again...

quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy


okay, first off like you said he has a right to speak his mind so why couldnt i speak my mind? like you said even if i am wrong i have a right to speak my mind. so dont talk to me about speaking minds.


you implicate completely wrong. Where did you get all this from? hahah, none of it is relevent...another failed victim attempt.

quote:

and another thing i dont care if i get angry about this. i have a right to be watever i want to be. and the reason why i got so mad at him is cuz he doesnt see my point and you dont either. but watever, like you said there is no winning right? so stop trying to keep this going.



I think we understand your point better than you do.

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell


Posted by MiGhTy KiTTy on 08-15-2002 09:58 PM:

snowman i am NOT trying to act like the victim. and where did i get the part? you didnt not read wat tm wrote right? it sounded to me like i couldnt speak my mind. and i am wrong for saying i can speak my mind? thanks alot.


Posted by PsychoSnowman on 08-15-2002 11:34 PM:

Overview:

1)extend MC chopstickz post, it's not that big of a deal, we should drop it sometime...haha.
2)cross apply TM11's 2nd post in thread about these being reasonable objections
3)cross apply point from like 2 of my posts about how it's not a big deal, it really isn't, even still. Long posts do not equal aggravation. Remember that. I was never mad, even though you said people were mad at you, but empiric ev. shows that you admitted you were the one who was mad, ok. So.....
4)no offense, only poor defense.

Off victimization arg:

1)cross apply my first point from my previous post. That answers
almost the entirety of your post.
2)extend the third word from your post at 8/15/02 at 2:51 AM EST, you don't know what you are talking about, and you don't know that you just keep repeating the same thing over and over.
3)extend your 1st point/2nd sentence from the same post, performative contradiction. You lose all credibility, my rationale supercedes as it is unanswered, and now accept my views instead of yours. TURN.
4)extend your 2nd post in this thread about people shouldn't get mad at you (pplz) for reposting. Empiric, you did proclaim a victim stance.
5)extend your 3rd post, 2nd and 3rd sentences, admitting that you are not at fault, thus playing victim, more ev.
6)analytic: if you aren't playing victim, what ARE you doing? at least be honest. "it's not my fault, it's society's"

Off "i couldnt speak my mind" arg:

1)extend your last sentece from the #2 argument outlined post. If you don't want to argue, why do you keep on coming back? I agree there isn't a lot of point to it, but you keep on coming back. You DO speak your mind, no one is stopping you.
2)extend all posts after that one by mightykitty, performative contradiction.
3)extend last sentence of your post at 8/15/02 at 4:07 pm EST, "stop trying to keep this going", more ev. that you do are, refer to #2.
4)cross apply 2nd point from my previous post, discourse "we" acknowledges i read TM11's response and agree.
5)extend my post from 2:52 pm EST from 8/15/02, particularly the part about "the basis of arguing is difference of opinions." Not really relevent anymore but defends my stance of discourse, not argumentation i guess.
6)extend TM11's 1st point from his post at 4:20pm EST 8/15/02, about you being able to say whatever you want. Again discourse proves my agreeance with him.

Off "thanks alot"

1)you are welcome.

I could go on, but it probably looks like i'm being obsessive haha, which i am not i assure you (i'm sure you'll come back and say "sure looks like it to me" haha, i don't care, accept my View! hahah) Anyway this really only took me about 5 minutes, so don't htink i went out of my way for you, and any other feeble aspect you could say to get on some sort of high horse ("haha you have way to much time on your hands") (hah, also, thats not assuming you are on a high horse all ready, k?)

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell


Posted by dalgyal on 08-15-2002 11:37 PM:

wow.. O_O;


o yea.. nd u should also put up dat u cant advertise ur site on a thread cuz i din kno dat before nd i did by mistake nd i got yelled at after. heheh` i didnt get yelled at.. buh --;; er, so ne ho0z newer [?] ppl should be told dat in advance. @_@;

__________________
simply-me.net
xanga.com/dalgyal


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page