|
Overview:
1)extend MC chopstickz post, it's not that big of a deal, we should drop it sometime...haha.
2)cross apply TM11's 2nd post in thread about these being reasonable objections
3)cross apply point from like 2 of my posts about how it's not a big deal, it really isn't, even still. Long posts do not equal aggravation. Remember that. I was never mad, even though you said people were mad at you, but empiric ev. shows that you admitted you were the one who was mad, ok. So.....
4)no offense, only poor defense.
Off victimization arg:
1)cross apply my first point from my previous post. That answers
almost the entirety of your post.
2)extend the third word from your post at 8/15/02 at 2:51 AM EST, you don't know what you are talking about, and you don't know that you just keep repeating the same thing over and over.
3)extend your 1st point/2nd sentence from the same post, performative contradiction. You lose all credibility, my rationale supercedes as it is unanswered, and now accept my views instead of yours. TURN.
4)extend your 2nd post in this thread about people shouldn't get mad at you (pplz) for reposting. Empiric, you did proclaim a victim stance.
5)extend your 3rd post, 2nd and 3rd sentences, admitting that you are not at fault, thus playing victim, more ev.
6)analytic: if you aren't playing victim, what ARE you doing? at least be honest. "it's not my fault, it's society's"
Off "i couldnt speak my mind" arg:
1)extend your last sentece from the #2 argument outlined post. If you don't want to argue, why do you keep on coming back? I agree there isn't a lot of point to it, but you keep on coming back. You DO speak your mind, no one is stopping you.
2)extend all posts after that one by mightykitty, performative contradiction.
3)extend last sentence of your post at 8/15/02 at 4:07 pm EST, "stop trying to keep this going", more ev. that you do are, refer to #2.
4)cross apply 2nd point from my previous post, discourse "we" acknowledges i read TM11's response and agree.
5)extend my post from 2:52 pm EST from 8/15/02, particularly the part about "the basis of arguing is difference of opinions." Not really relevent anymore but defends my stance of discourse, not argumentation i guess.
6)extend TM11's 1st point from his post at 4:20pm EST 8/15/02, about you being able to say whatever you want. Again discourse proves my agreeance with him.
Off "thanks alot"
1)you are welcome.
I could go on, but it probably looks like i'm being obsessive haha, which i am not i assure you (i'm sure you'll come back and say "sure looks like it to me" haha, i don't care, accept my View! hahah) Anyway this really only took me about 5 minutes, so don't htink i went out of my way for you, and any other feeble aspect you could say to get on some sort of high horse ("haha you have way to much time on your hands") (hah, also, thats not assuming you are on a high horse all ready, k?)
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
Last edited by PsychoSnowman on 08-16-2002 at 12:14 AM
|
08-14-2002 06:48 AM
no David... DO NOT go there... puhaha 
. I am thoroughly surprised and amazed at this ability. If you both have differing opinions on something, that's no reason not to discuss your objections. No one has to "win" an argument here. I'm sure everyone here is aware of the differing opinions of the people participating in this thread, it's also obvious you weren't, until recently. That shouldn't stop a polite discussion from occuring, even if people are going to be brash. It doesn't seem to me that anyone here was arguing.
