![]() |
Pages (2): [1] 2 » Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page |
Jusunlee.com Forums (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/index.php)
- Random Thoughts (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?forumid=2)
-- for newer members (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=4117)
for newer members
quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
you guys should tell me these things. :sad:
__________________
word is bond
yes VERY good idea.
i know it's not just me, but that post was meant to be sarcastic.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
quote:
Originally posted by PsychoSnowman
i know it's not just me, but that post was meant to be sarcastic.
quote:
Originally posted by PsychoSnowman
i know it's not just me, but that post was meant to be sarcastic.
__________________
sHIET happens.. then u move ON
quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
NOT TRUE! if it is, then dont get mad at the pplz who accidentally post a thread that is similar to another one. SHEESH.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
quote:
Originally posted by PsychoSnowman
SHEESH, you're the only one who ever gets mad at people for telling you it's all ready been posted before. Look at the posts, particularly when you isolated tea, he just said something like "uh, this was all ready a thread." And YOU blew up. It didn't sound like he was mad to me. but, YOU do. hahaha.
quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
it's not that im isolating him, he has been mean to me ever since i got here.
quote:
is it my fault that i get mad at someone who is mean to me? i dont think so
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
omfg snowman stfu. its not the nationality thread that he was mean to me about. damn why dont you just accept wat I THINK, you dont have to say anything about it. eesh. also i do admit is it my fault to repeat things but who actually looks for a topic that they wanan discuss? i think its insane to look up every topic you wanna start. so please dont tell me what i already know. ahh..watever..you win. okay? theres no point in arguing about this fucking topic. we have two different perspectives about this.
please please people can we juss drop it and get along??
there no point arguing about repeating othre post it sjuss dumb so lets hold hands and sing
quote:
Originally posted by PsychoSnowman
Psytek.
yeah, hah, sorry! Yeah Julie, there have been a whole lot of arguments lately. Anyway, I won't go into psytek-esque routes further. All of a sudden, I guess i'm not "open-minded" enough haha (sarcasm). I don't accept what you think because i don't like being "responsible" for your mistake, not to mention that what you think is alwyas fluctuating, also because it's stupid. I was telling you what you wouldn't admit, not what you all ready knew (that statement contradicts every single one of your old posts) mightykitty, there's a difference. It's not that i'm not openminded enough, it's that you don't have a steady, good opinion...here's a brand new victim tactic you bring up, it's ludicrous again...thats the point of arguing; because we have two different opinions. And it doesn't matter if i didn't choose your ideal thread whre someone was being "mean" to you. The thread i chose shows what i described and how you behave irrationally rather quickly getting mad at everyone else who tells you politely theres all ready a thread like that. See? it didn't matter, even if it was effectual, the reactions are constant. Oh well, dropping it...moving on....hopefully even though i said some other things in this post. But....dropping it....as i stfu hahahaha
btw, such fowl language mightykitty. Could it be more anger that "we" have against you?
Actually, this was kind of a mean post, i apologize, there won't be anymore! Seriously. It's just that now i'm enthralled in this whole predicament, but was never really mad, as i'm being accused of.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
First, to clarify, I am surprised someone thought I was being totally serious in my original post (I did kind of want to see how this would be played out, whether people would actually post titles of topics, or do otherwise. Either way I think somewhat of a service has been done to the forums. I might be wrong though). Anyways, I thought I was laying down the sarcasm pretty thickly... I suppose I could have been clearer.
quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
omfg snowman stfu.
quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
damn why dont you just accept wat I THINK, you dont have to say anything about it.
quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
theres no point in arguing about this fucking topic. we have two different perspectives about this.
__________________
word is bond
some topics that have been discussed:
-for newer members
-spiders
-what are you thinking about right now
-say something nice
-how long does it take for you to finish in the shower?
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
quote:
Originally posted by tm11
He shouldn't have to accept what you think, no one should have to. It's his right to say what's on his mind, just as everyone on this forum should speak their minds, In my opinion. In this instance, you happened to be very wrong. That's why he shouldn't just accept "wat you THINK." Anyways, he was being reasonable in his objections.
quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
and another thing i dont care if i get angry about this. i have a right to be watever i want to be. and the reason why i got so mad at him is cuz he doesnt see my point and you dont either. but watever, like you said there is no winning right? so stop trying to keep this going.
__________________
word is bond
going against my own words and the chance of reiterating what has all ready been said...here i am replying again...
quote:
Originally posted by MiGhTy KiTTy
okay, first off like you said he has a right to speak his mind so why couldnt i speak my mind? like you said even if i am wrong i have a right to speak my mind. so dont talk to me about speaking minds.
quote:
and another thing i dont care if i get angry about this. i have a right to be watever i want to be. and the reason why i got so mad at him is cuz he doesnt see my point and you dont either. but watever, like you said there is no winning right? so stop trying to keep this going.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
snowman i am NOT trying to act like the victim. and where did i get the part? you didnt not read wat tm wrote right? it sounded to me like i couldnt speak my mind. and i am wrong for saying i can speak my mind? thanks alot.
Overview:
1)extend MC chopstickz post, it's not that big of a deal, we should drop it sometime...haha.
2)cross apply TM11's 2nd post in thread about these being reasonable objections
3)cross apply point from like 2 of my posts about how it's not a big deal, it really isn't, even still. Long posts do not equal aggravation. Remember that. I was never mad, even though you said people were mad at you, but empiric ev. shows that you admitted you were the one who was mad, ok. So.....
4)no offense, only poor defense.
Off victimization arg:
1)cross apply my first point from my previous post. That answers
almost the entirety of your post.
2)extend the third word from your post at 8/15/02 at 2:51 AM EST, you don't know what you are talking about, and you don't know that you just keep repeating the same thing over and over.
3)extend your 1st point/2nd sentence from the same post, performative contradiction. You lose all credibility, my rationale supercedes as it is unanswered, and now accept my views instead of yours. TURN.
4)extend your 2nd post in this thread about people shouldn't get mad at you (pplz) for reposting. Empiric, you did proclaim a victim stance.
5)extend your 3rd post, 2nd and 3rd sentences, admitting that you are not at fault, thus playing victim, more ev.
6)analytic: if you aren't playing victim, what ARE you doing? at least be honest. "it's not my fault, it's society's"
Off "i couldnt speak my mind" arg:
1)extend your last sentece from the #2 argument outlined post. If you don't want to argue, why do you keep on coming back? I agree there isn't a lot of point to it, but you keep on coming back. You DO speak your mind, no one is stopping you.
2)extend all posts after that one by mightykitty, performative contradiction.
3)extend last sentence of your post at 8/15/02 at 4:07 pm EST, "stop trying to keep this going", more ev. that you do are, refer to #2.
4)cross apply 2nd point from my previous post, discourse "we" acknowledges i read TM11's response and agree.
5)extend my post from 2:52 pm EST from 8/15/02, particularly the part about "the basis of arguing is difference of opinions." Not really relevent anymore but defends my stance of discourse, not argumentation i guess.
6)extend TM11's 1st point from his post at 4:20pm EST 8/15/02, about you being able to say whatever you want. Again discourse proves my agreeance with him.
Off "thanks alot"
1)you are welcome.
I could go on, but it probably looks like i'm being obsessive haha, which i am not i assure you (i'm sure you'll come back and say "sure looks like it to me" haha, i don't care, accept my View! hahah) Anyway this really only took me about 5 minutes, so don't htink i went out of my way for you, and any other feeble aspect you could say to get on some sort of high horse ("haha you have way to much time on your hands") (hah, also, thats not assuming you are on a high horse all ready, k?)
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
wow.. O_O;
o yea.. nd u should also put up dat u cant advertise ur site on a thread cuz i din kno dat before nd i did by mistake nd i got yelled at after. heheh` i didnt get yelled at.. buh --;; er, so ne ho0z newer [?] ppl should be told dat in advance. @_@;
__________________
simply-me.net
xanga.com/dalgyal
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23 PM. | Pages (2): [1] 2 » Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page |