Bored? Come in and play at Jusunlee.com Arcade! Go chat in Jusunlee.com Chatroom (requires AIM) Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home
Jusunlee.com Forums > Intellectuals > Spiritual Life > does archaeology verify the Bible?
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
daNNy LuV 1TYM
. : c r y : .

Registered: Mar 2002
Location: california
Posts: 3376
Status: Offline

does archaeology verify the Bible?

Over the years there have been many criticisms leveled against the Bible concerning its historical reliability. These criticisms are usually based on a lack of evidence from outside sources to confirm the Biblical record. Since the Bible is a religious book, many scholars take the position that it is biased and cannot be trusted unless we have corroborating evidence from extra-Biblical sources. In other words, the Bible is guilty until proven innocent, and a lack of outside evidence places the Biblical account in doubt.
This standard is far different from that applied to other ancient documents, even though many, if not most, have a religious element. They are considered to be accurate, unless there is evidence to show that they are not. Although it is not possible to verify every incident in the Bible, the discoveries of archaeology since the mid 1800s have demonstrated the reliability and plausibility of the Bible narrative. Here are some examples.

The discovery of the Ebla archive in northern Syria in the 1970s has shown the Biblical writings concerning the Patriarchs to be viable. Documents written on clay tablets from around 2300 B.C. demonstrate that personal and place names in the Patriarchal accounts are genuine. The name "Canaan" was in use in Ebla, a name critics once said was not used at that time and was used incorrectly in the early chapters of the Bible. The word "tehom" ("the deep") in Genesis 1:2 was said to be a late word demonstrating the late writing of the creation story. "Tehom" was part of the vocabulary at Ebla, in use some 800 years before Moses. Ancient customs reflected in the stories of the Patriarchs have also been found in clay tablets from Nuzi and Mari.

The Hittites were once thought to be a Biblical legend, until their capital and records were discovered at Bogazkoy, Turkey. Many thought the Biblical references to Solomon's wealth were greatly exaggerated. Recovered records from the past show that wealth in antiquity was concentrated with the king and Solomon's prosperity was entirely feasible. It was once claimed there was no Assyrian king named Sargon as recorded in Isaiah 20:1, because this name was not known in any other record. Then, Sargon's palace was discovered in Khorsabad, Iraq. The very event mentioned in Isaiah 20, his capture of Ashdod, was recorded on the palace walls. What is more, fragments of a stela memorializing the victory were found at Ashdod itself.

Another king who was in doubt was Belshazzar, king of Babylon, named in Daniel 5. The last king of Babylon was Nabonidus according to recorded history. Tablets were found showing that Belshazzar was Nabonidus' son who served as coregent in Babylon. Thus, Belshazzar could offer to make Daniel "third highest ruler in the kingdom" (Dan. 5:16) for reading the handwriting on the wall, the highest available position. Here we see the "eye-witness" nature of the Biblical record, as is so often brought out by the discoveries of archaeology.

Source: http://www.christiananswers.net/


hmm, i found this interesting. i like reading these kinds of articles to see how Christianity fits in with the rest of the world, even though i think true believers wouldn't need this kind of evidence to verify their faith. i think there was a thread a while back about whether the Bible was true or not, so maybe these kinds of articles can answer questions.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-03-2003 12:20 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for daNNy LuV 1TYM Click here to Send daNNy LuV 1TYM a Private Message Find more posts by daNNy LuV 1TYM Add daNNy LuV 1TYM to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
.aS.|5p!7f!|23
foo oo o o o oo o oo o o

Registered: Nov 2002
Location:
Posts: 1353
Status: Offline

i didnt really read all of this but how neutral is a source called christianityanswers.net. even if it tried to stay neutral i bet it couldnt. -- i just looked at the site, if i felt like it i could go to the national atheistic answers page or satanic answers page and post some propaganda up i probably wouldnt cause i realize that it doesnt have all that much credibility. youll probably disagree so shoot.

go to the site and look at the sponsors, if there was anything that leaned even a small amount away from being biased toward religion i dont think those would all be there.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-03-2003 02:31 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for .aS.|5p!7f!|23 Click here to Send .aS.|5p!7f!|23 a Private Message Find more posts by .aS.|5p!7f!|23 Add .aS.|5p!7f!|23 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
daNNy LuV 1TYM
. : c r y : .

Registered: Mar 2002
Location: california
Posts: 3376
Status: Offline

quote:
Originally posted by .aS.|5p!7f!|23
i didnt really read all of this but how neutral is a source called christianityanswers.net. even if it tried to stay neutral i bet it couldnt. -- i just looked at the site, if i felt like it i could go to the national atheistic answers page or satanic answers page and post some propaganda up i probably wouldnt cause i realize that it doesnt have all that much credibility. youll probably disagree so shoot.

go to the site and look at the sponsors, if there was anything that leaned even a small amount away from being biased toward religion i dont think those would all be there.


that's true. i hadn't realized that. but, i personally like to look at the Bible as more than a set of guidelines to live by but also as a historical document. well, i didn't post this with the intent of having people read it and then think "hey, that sounds logical. now i can believe." i just thought it was interesting

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-03-2003 07:02 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for daNNy LuV 1TYM Click here to Send daNNy LuV 1TYM a Private Message Find more posts by daNNy LuV 1TYM Add daNNy LuV 1TYM to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
.aS.|5p!7f!|23
foo oo o o o oo o oo o o

Registered: Nov 2002
Location:
Posts: 1353
Status: Offline

o ok i think the bible is all interpretation to a certain extent.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-03-2003 11:39 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for .aS.|5p!7f!|23 Click here to Send .aS.|5p!7f!|23 a Private Message Find more posts by .aS.|5p!7f!|23 Add .aS.|5p!7f!|23 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
daNNy LuV 1TYM
. : c r y : .

Registered: Mar 2002
Location: california
Posts: 3376
Status: Offline

quote:
Originally posted by .aS.|5p!7f!|23
o ok i think the bible is all interpretation to a certain extent.

actually, so do i

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-09-2003 12:34 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for daNNy LuV 1TYM Click here to Send daNNy LuV 1TYM a Private Message Find more posts by daNNy LuV 1TYM Add daNNy LuV 1TYM to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:22 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread

Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON