|
i think understanding is only one way of obtaining peace. I agree it's very likely that peace can be reached through violence as well, why not? is the question.
And, in regards to the initial posed question...i think it's stupid. War doesn't become more acceptable. The nuclear arms race is proof of that. It's become all the more taboo, and frowned upon. Think about it, that's why conventional war is the only "acceptable" form of war. As in, a compromise of war methodology. The general tenet is that war shouldn't involve higher forms of technology because they are so dangerous, nuclear, bio, radiological, chemical, whatever. It's not making it more acceptable, if it was we'd be fighting with those, (i know that's not the only reason, second strikes is a reason as is many others, no need to point out the flaws in my logif.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
|
12-18-2002 03:07 AM
again, cloning people is just a way to make money and find oneself in public... it's dispicable (sp?)... I find it immoral and disgusting 
again, we are taking what we know a step too far into what we don't NEED but what we WANT... As of right now, it is illegal in the states to clone people, and it should stay that way... (should be illegal in other countries also) we do not know enough about DNA to do such a thing yet... there WILL be a defect in our outcome, maybe not the first couple times we do it, but it will occur some time later... we should think about safety first, if we want to create the super human with the ideological characteristics... I like nature and what it has done!!!
