quote:

---

Originally posted by TAIgrr
huh? again? what other time was he wrong?

---

__________________
immagijibae: seons a hoeeeeeee, he wears them g-strings, and i also knowwwww, they hurt his dinga-lings~ la l alalala~ nanannan~ oh~ seons a hoeeeeee, he wears them g-strings..............
immagijibae: liiiiiiiiiiiiiike my new 1-minute-made-up song???????

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I think it shouldnt be a measurement of how different or similiar personalites are..all that matters is what personality is best for you, which one that clicks the most..for every person it is a different situation so there is no way of telling which one is better...you just know...when you get the feeling that you've never felt before then you know trust me

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

words of a genius. . i agree.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by TAIgrr
huh? again? what other time was he wrong?

---

__________________
ni pour ni contre; ça m'est égal

"The weight of this sad time we must obey,/ Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say./ The oldest hath borne most; we that are young/ Shall never see so much, nor live so long."
King Lear (V.3.300-304)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Crazydeb8ter
i seems to recall that you had 'once again' in your original statement...not to mention the fact that you suspiciously edited your post later on.

---

__________________
.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by TAIgrr
and i edited the numbers

---

oh must be faulty memory then. my bad

__________________
ni pour ni contre; ça m'est égal

"The weight of this sad time we must obey,/ Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say./ The oldest hath borne most; we that are young/ Shall never see so much, nor live so long."
King Lear (V.3.300-304)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by psyTeK ver. 2.0
wow, five or more girlfriends.

don't get me wrong, however, because that wasn't anything near an "i'm impressed" statement. in fact, its quite a record of failure if all you've learned from them is that everything is "bullshit".

to marvin: maybe relationships and love is all "bullshit" to you because you don't have anything more to give or offer in a relationship other than "bullshit"... so don't go off ranting with that "damned it all to hell" attitude just because your not the one doing anything right with the girls.

and something i won't let slide from you. face the facts. regardless if "your version is getting more action than my version", it still won't change that fact that "my version" is probably more respected among people than yours is. i feel clean. do you?

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

im sorry to double post but it jus occured to me...that im responding to ur statements...but ur statements dont follow a train of thought....if u could explain to me how from the first post i should "face the facts....[im] not getting attention from the ladies" which makes little to no sense, goes to..."a record of failure", to i have "nothing to offer in a relationship", which leads to facing facts once again on how you are "PROBABLY more respected" 'version'

if i may....this is dialectic by psytek(notice the lettering/numbering system)

A. face facts-im not gettin attention
2. i)i have a record of failure
c)nothing to offer in relationship
D. facing facts again- psytek is PROBABLY the more respected 'version' (i was under the impression that the word 'probably' was NOT factual)

shall i continue to rip ur arguements to pieces? or do u want to continue to make a fool of urself? ur grabass methodology its astounding

try to get verbose on my ass again

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by marvinOPPA
im sorry to double post but it jus occured to me...that im responding to ur statements...but ur statements dont follow a train of thought....if u could explain to me how from the first post i should "face the facts....[im] not getting attention from the ladies" which makes little to no sense, goes to..."a record of failure", to i have "nothing to offer in a relationship", which leads to facing facts once again on how you are "PROBABLY more respected" 'version'

if i may....this is dialectic by psytek(notice the lettering/numbering system)

A. face facts-im not gettin attention
2. i)i have a record of failure
c)nothing to offer in relationship
D. facing facts again- psytek is PROBABLY the more
respected 'version' (i was under the impression that the word 'probably' was NOT factual)

shall i continue to rip ur arguements to pieces? or do u want to continue to make a fool of urself? ur grabass methodology its astounding

try to get verbose on my ass again

---

__________________
¢´ Face The Facts ¢´

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by psyTeK ver. 2.0


someone tell me if this guy is just trying to mess with me, because it seems to me he's just trying to protect his pride in front of the forum audience and therefore wrote the above response because he was mad and had nothing else to say. it's ok though, i understand.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by psyTeK ver. 2.0
face the facts, your getting your panties in a bunch for nothing, kid. everything i said seems to be easily understood by everyone else with the exception of you. it does follow a train of thought based on everything you've posted in this thread, but i'm not going to take the time to argue and prove what i was trying to say. because i think the majority here know what my points were towards you.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

face the ass ,
both of you will turn into bitter old men with striking similarities and huge differences. maybe you two should hook up. want some digits?

__________________

xanga.com/an1_mixtape

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

i think different..cuz....it's more romantic..=_=
haha.. i tried different.. it was really hard
but..it was so lovely..cuz..you have to change
your personalite for him and you have to follow him
step by step.. ^^ if you have same personalite with
your love..then......................=3

[ think about this way..if your fire.. and you need water
for save people and your things rite?.. wut if your
love is fire are toO?.. then end's up with more big problem..]

¡è that doesn't make sense..=_= but.. you know wut i mean..
i can't really wirtin in ln eglish like that! cuz..i heard in korean;;

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

you seem like a nice girl, so please don't take offense to what i'm about to say

quote:

---

Originally posted by yubeenie
but..it was so lovely..cuz..you have to change
your personalite for him and you have to follow him
step by step..

---

__________________
ni pour ni contre; ça m'est égal

"The weight of this sad time we must obey,/ Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say./ The oldest hath borne most; we that are young/ Shall never see so much, nor live so long."
King Lear (V.3.300-304)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Crazydeb8ter
That analogy makes no sense whatsoever. If your love is symbolized by fire, then water would only serve to extinguish the flames, and destroy your love.

---

__________________
.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by TAIgrr
Pretend fire sybolizes personalities.

---

__________________
ni pour ni contre; ça m'est égal

"The weight of this sad time we must obey,/ Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say./ The oldest hath borne most; we that are young/ Shall never see so much, nor live so long."
King Lear (V.3.300-304)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by yubeenie
wut if your
love is fire are toO?]

---

__________________
.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by TAIgrr
one of the definitions of love is : A person who is the object of deep or intense affection or attraction; beloved. Often used as a term of endearment.
she was using the word LOVE as the person of whom the other person loves.

so rephrasing her statement..:

what if your love (mate) is fire too?

---

__________________
ni pour ni contre; ça m'est égal

"The weight of this sad time we must obey,/ Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say./ The oldest hath borne most; we that are young/ Shall never see so much, nor live so long."
King Lear (V.3.300-304)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Crazydeb8ter
then we'll wait for her to explicate which interpretation she meant originally.

Either way not only is her analogy a far stretch, but also ignores many major issues that must be considered in such a relationship: fire is used to fight fire is well.

---

1) fine lets wait. if im right.. i win THAT arguement and its 2 : 100

2) explain how fire is used to fight fire in a relationship.

__________________
.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by TAIgrr
explain how fire is used to fight fire in a relationship.

---

__________________
ni pour ni contre; ça m'est égal

"The weight of this sad time we must obey,/ Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say./ The oldest hath borne most; we that are young/ Shall never see so much, nor live so long."
King Lear (V.3.300-304)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged