|
quote:
Originally posted by aznkid1008
traditional warfare always changes it isnt a standard but this is a huge leap thats wat i ment. tradition doesnt mean shit i kno but i liked the old way better then missles that can obliterate us before we even kno wat happened.
Ok, people died in the past by fighting each other directly, and now we initiate bomb strikes and the like to pursue our battle. But, it's not like ground troop fighting is gone, because then we wouldn't be sending them into countries still. We don't just sit back and bomb people. We sit back and threat, and hope they back off, and then we either bomb them or pursue with land troops or something. You are making it too black and white. It's not just a missle war. I'm not sure what regard you hold traditional warfare in, but i don't see why you would like it or why it's better in any way. It's just fighting in a different way, nothing more honorable about either, nothing better about either. It's hard to make fighting be in good light, and i don't think traditional warfare or modern warfare does a good job of either. Any difference is miniscule. And, furthermore, there's nothing you or anyone else can do about it i guess is what i'm saying. No use complaining about something if nothing will every happen. Think about it, if we stop developing bombs then other countries will get ahead of us, i don't see why you are so mad about it...it is a necessary evil.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
|
03-12-2003 05:34 AM
