|
quote:
Originally posted by Ladi Jay
lol, that's just one source and it was an easy source for me to put up for you guys.. I have loads and loads of Hmong history books and a magazine that explains the findings in China and research that went on there with scientists and historians and all... explains things really well and that's what got me to believe what I believe now...
oh, and it was offensive to me
um, i've been endorsing a multi-faceted view, allowing for multiple origins to be accepted, i don't see how that's offensive to you, especially when you call us ignorant, when i've displayed more of an educated opinion than you have, exempting your dogmatic claim of reading all these documents that say it's from china (those of which aren't absolutely true with certainty.....now that is ignorant, but did i say that? no, you did and didn't have any justification though and that is rather offensive)....so, did i ever. The only thing that makes you seem not ignorant is the mere fact that you are hmong, and we must be ignorant then since we're not huh? Read our posts and you'll see a lack of that which you speak of. You haven't said anything that presbyopic yourself.
Now, tell me how endorsing my viewpoint is somehow ignorant in comparison with you, not allowing for any other viewpoint in? Isn't that pretty much what ignorance is? I'm allowing many viewpoints in, and you allowing one...and me, ignorant? I don't see why you tossed that word in there, you said it earlier to ilsung where i think that was not justified either because it was all on assumptions...again, that is the icon of ignorance, not knowing, and you didn't know why ilsung said that and you just said he was ignorant...that is pretty much ignorance in itself julie i don't see how you are justified at all no matter how offended you were...(can you tell us what ofended you btw?). you knew nothing of his rationale at the time, and then just blatantly state: "and i thought I was ignorant!" or something, enquire before name calling please.
And ok, who cares if you were offended? you were the one who called everyone ignorant in the thread, so now me being offended doesn't matter because you are? Why are you so important? I'm offended too, i imagine some of these other guys are, i don't see how you can prioritize people in front of each other..."Hey, i'm offended, i might as well offend everyone else cause they deserve it!" that's what it sounds like.
finally, responding to your "loads and loads of hmong history books and magazines"...didn't i outline that all ready? There is no absolute certainty of where the hmongs originated from, and i would bet some money you haven't read all the loads of hmong history you have (let's not just reiterate my post from before, k? read it first)...regardless, it doesn't matter, what more does quantity prove? The majority of information regarding Tyrannosaurus Rex's says that they are sprinting predators, but does that mean it's true? Does the miniscule evidence showing T-Rex's are in fact scavengers mean they aren't scavengers just because there isn't that much written down on paper in comparison with the other theory? That is exactly what you are saying julie. Absolutely no substantiality at all.
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
Last edited by PsychoSnowman on 12-06-2002 at 10:03 PM
|
12-03-2002 10:28 PM
