I was just discussing this with my psychology teacher the other day, because we're currently studying personality.
Julie, you're wrong about this, and it'd be nice if you actually knew correct information about this.
The statement that you can't get any evidence about this shows how your ignorance. There are a multitude of cases where Identical twins (who have the same genetic composition since they came from the same egg) were split up, and when they were observed later in their lives, they were found to have many same characteristics and personality traits, and I'm sure they had very differing lives. Still, they end up being the same, how do you explain that? This is why psychologists often study Identical twins to study personality, because you have 2 people that have the same "nature," and that's how you measure the effect of "nurture" on them. If they end up being the same, "nurture" obviously doesn't have much effect on them, now does it?
You even provide a perfect example for how Nature affects a person's personality and how they'll turn out than nurture will. Nurture does have an effect, but ONLY TO A POINT.
I'll ask my Psychology teacher for specific examples, you haven't provided any either, and you've provided poor examples at that. It's bootless to debate this.
your example is flawed, for several reasons. All of your "evidence" is subjective because they're all what you think. Before I knew any better, I thought that nurture affected a person more than nature did, but after actually reading LITERATURE on the topic, I found out the inverse was true.
__________________
word is bond
|