quote: Originally posted by Crazydeb8ter
K is like a double-edged sword IMO. If the teams are good, and understand it and understand how to run it through and through, then it calls for a good debate that would be really interesting.
However, Ks are also like the newbie golden gun. Though it might be hard for them to do so, if they just convince the judge that it is both independent voter and that they capture it, then they win. Just like that. Doesn't matter how skilled they are, or how well they understand the case.
Yeah i suppose, but not always, and moreso i think not usually. Especially when the aff tries to permute them, then it gets interesting.
I'm gonna write this sweet case that avoids all K's haha, it actually does avoid a whole lot of them i just have to figure out how to make it topical (haha, yep).
__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.
"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell
|