Jusunlee.com Forums (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/index.php)
- Debate (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- goodness of mankind (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=11699)

goodness of mankind

do you think think goodness of mankind exists? never was? i personally believe in the goodness of mankind...even if the numbers are falling...for those people i still believe in you..this is somewhat a vague topic..opinion..thoughts..

just saying, but i really don't like "common man" linguistics...

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell

Generalizing man is like answering E=mc˛. It's impossible and generally you're wrong as it is.

__________________
When the day is done
you are all that is left

ok

ok

quote:

---

Originally posted by requiem
Generalizing man is like answering E=mc˛. It's impossible and generally you're wrong as it is.

---

Answer it.
You can't - you don't have a mass or the energy involved. Hence, answering it is impossible. That is what I meant. Generalizing man is equally impossible.

__________________
When the day is done
you are all that is left

two of the three must be given to you in the first place if you want to call it a problem and not a formula. i agree that generalizing man is impossible but i just dont see eye to eye with your example.

One is a constant so it's only one out of two.
But I see what you mean. It was a long time ago that I made that post anyway.

__________________
When the day is done
you are all that is left

i think the point that requiem was making is that there isn't one single answer to E = MC^2. Saying htere is only one answer is generalizing; however, he doesn't exclude the possibilities of actual answers being yielded through that equation. Actual answers yielded with values given to solve for whatever would not be generalizations to the extent that requiem is talking about, it'd be more of a case by case thing.

E = MC^2 doesn't have an answer, it has many. That's the point i think. Correct me if i'm wrong please.

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell

quote:

---

Originally posted by PsychoSnowman
i think the point that requiem was making is that there isn't one single answer to E = MC^2. Saying htere is only one answer is generalizing; however, he doesn't exclude the possibilities of actual answers being yielded through that equation. Actual answers yielded with values given to solve for whatever would not be generalizations to the extent that requiem is talking about, it'd be more of a case by case thing.

E = MC^2 doesn't have an answer, it has many. That's the point i think. Correct me if i'm wrong please.

---

__________________
When the day is done
you are all that is left

quote:

---

Originally posted by requiem
Generalizing man is equally impossible.

---

__________________
the fool is the one who thinks he is wise, yet the wise one is the one who thinks he is a fool

Remember the heros
Remember the lives
Remember the day
God bless

I'm sorry, but what numbers prove otherwise? Crime has actually been dropping within the past decade. Media coverage, on the other hand, has increased exponentially.

__________________
"Wave of mutilation."
-The Pixies

Re: goodness of mankind

quote:

---

Originally posted by kangg fu
do you think think goodness of mankind exists? never was? i personally believe in the goodness of mankind...even if the numbers are falling...for those people i still believe in you..this is somewhat a vague topic..opinion..thoughts..

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by PsychoSnowman
i think the point that requiem was making is that there isn't one single answer to E = MC^2. Saying htere is only one answer is generalizing; however, he doesn't exclude the possibilities of actual answers being yielded through that equation. Actual answers yielded with values given to solve for whatever would not be generalizations to the extent that requiem is talking about, it'd be more of a case by case thing.

E = MC^2 doesn't have an answer, it has many. That's the point i think. Correct me if i'm wrong please.

---

hmm

my bad what rawr itz errinn was what i meant...he intention...the potential...

quote:

---

Originally posted by kryogenix
yeah, the E, M and C are all variables...

---

__________________
When the day is done
you are all that is left

quote:

---

Originally posted by requiem
C is not a variable, C is a constant
3x10^8 m/s (speed of light)

---

instead of generalizing mankind... I can say that goodness does exist, but I don't think it exists in every single person. But, it does exist.

__________________