Jusunlee.com Forums Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page

Jusunlee.com Forums (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/index.php)
- Debate (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- evolution or revelation? (https://www.jusunlee.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=12280)

Posted by phil c on 05-23-2003 07:54 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by kryogenix
yes, people get real touchy when they argue about the issue between creationism and evolutionism


agred

__________________
phil c

Posted by PsychoSnowman on 05-23-2003 09:19 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by phil c
agred...u dont hafta change ur ideals snow...im juss statin my beliefs...no one said u hafta convert...


oh nevermind, i confused you with rawr its erinn haha, sorry. I thought you said that in response to what i said to her (as i thought you were her) and i didn't look to see if you were indeed the one who talked about the evolutionary flaws shown through extinction as you addressed me as snow seemingly in response to what i just said. I thought you were rawr its erinn, and...you weren't haha sorry, no question then.

__________________
Long messages do not equal aggravation of any sort,
rather they reflect nothing more than a response of insight
that should always be read in a matter-of-fact tone.

"Those womyn that seek equality with men, lack determination."

"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be wrong."
-Cromwell

Posted by .aS.|5p!7f!|23 on 05-23-2003 09:50 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rawr itz errinn
nothing really relevant to this topic... but i thought i might say this. a group of scientists found a fossil of this one fish that they had never identified before. they did their little carbon dating thing and said it was a few million years old (or was it a few billion, i can't keep up with huge numbers)and claimed it to be extinct. anyhow, a short time later, they found the species of fish... that was living.
i think shes saying that scientists were wrong about something and therefore lost all credibility.
quote:
oh and if you want some verification on the archaeology...check this out...
i didnt really read all of this but how neutral is a source called christianityanswers.net. even if it tried to stay neutral i bet it couldnt. -- i just looked at the site, if i felt like it i could go to the national atheistic answers page or satanic answers page and post some propaganda up i probably wouldnt cause i realize that it doesnt have all that much credibility. youll probably disagree so shoot.

go to the site and look at the sponsors, if there was anything that leaned even a small amount away from being biased toward religion i dont think those would all be there.
(i posted this before but i think its relevent to this)

Posted by MaGiKToToRo on 06-07-2003 07:23 AM:

I really don't believe in God creating man in his image.... I think Darwin's theory of evolution and natural selection explain the creation of man better than the bible

__________________
"Fear less, hope more;
Whine less, breathe more;
Talk less, say more;
Hate less, love more;
And all good things are yours."

-Sweedish Proverb


aim: MaGiKToToRo
xanga: MaGiKToToRo

Posted by phil c on 06-08-2003 07:02 AM:

i mean datz fine, those are your beliefs and im not criticizing anyone

__________________
phil c
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 AM. Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page